This blog was originally published at Vulnerability 360 and Leicester Cares.
Leicestershire Cares is a local charity and membership organisation that seeks to connect business with the local community, so nobody is left behind. I have been working for Cares for three years and many of our “simple” truths are ever more relevant to the divided world we increasingly find ourselves in.
At the heart of what we do is a belief that community is important, and wealth can be measured by more than just balance sheets and profits. It is in everyone’s interest to work together to create communities where people flourish and live rewarding, fulfilling lives. The business sector often has a wealth of resources, skills and experience it can share within the local community. The key being that each side seeks to understand and work in partnership with the other for mutual benefit.
The rise of corporate social responsibility and shared vision within the business community places a greater emphasis on businesses seeking to give back and be active participants in the local community. For many businesses this commitment to giving back is now part of their “mission”, reflected in their corporate values and a key driver for recruiting and retaining staff.
However, reality is often not that simple. The rise of globalisation means that many significant decisions, for example the way local industry might develop, are taken in foreign countries with little opportunity for local control. The perennial debate of should business pay staff more or pay more taxes rather than decide how to support communities continues. On the community side debates rage about which communities are represented, who decides what is funded. The reduction of funding to the sector means groups can end up competing rather than cooperating.
How you frame and answer the questions these issues raise is in part influenced by your political persuasion. Modern politics evolves around questions such as; what is the role of the state and markets, how do we respond to globalisation and climate change, how do we ensure accountability and ultimately what constitutes a “good life”?
A wealth creation approach to community development moves beyond “income” as the sole measure of a “good life”. Income is important, but “crucially” for people living in a poor community, income can be “stop start” and leave them very vulnerable to economic downturns. A community that offers security, a sense of belonging, affordable housing, decent schools, health provision and infrastructure has a “communal wealth” that provides a solid foundation for the community to thrive and be resilient through the highs and lows of economic activity.
Communities that provide these are more likely to thrive, attract new investment and produce educated people who want to succeed and remain within their communities. A wealth creation approach is a “win win” for community and business and one that must be developed and explored.
A wealth creation approach encourages joined up thinking and challenges people to ask how an activity adds value to a community. The Ford foundation emphasises the importance of value chains to this approach:
“A value chain is a business model in which independent producers, buyers and other players in the chain (e.g. aggregators, processors, inspectors, policy-makers, trainers, suppliers, consumers) work together to create value and share risk and reward. Value chain participants intentionally consider how to create economic, social and environmental benefits. Such a focus forms the basis for positive reciprocal relationships among participants. A value chain connects the demand and supply sides of a market in such a way that all pa